CANTON - A bill under consideration in the state Legislature would require the county sheriff to notify you if a convicted animal abuser lived in your neighborhood.
The state Senate and Assembly are considering creating a registry for those convicted of felony animal abuse, similar though not identical to the registry for sex offenders.
Anyone convicted of felony abuse would have to forward their information, including their photograph and address, to their countys sheriffs department. The sheriffs department, in turn, would be required to notify every home, business, school and animal shelter within a half mile of the animal abusers home that a scruffy scofflaw was in their midst.
I think the registry concept is something worthy of exploration, said state Sen. Joseph A. Griffo, R-Rome, a cosponsor of the bill. Weve done it in a number of cases. They are something that have worked from a human perspective.
Mr. Griffo held a public hearing Wednesday in Utica to discuss what he said was a spike in animal abuse in Central and Northern New York. The legislative action is in response to an uptick in animal abuse and a high-profile case in West Utica, where a man allegedly had dead and emaciated dogs in his home.
The animal abuse registry was one of several measures discussed at the public hearing by law enforcement officials and animal rights advocates.
Animal abuse tends to spill over into abuse of humans, statistics show. But an animal abuse registry could raise eyebrows among small-government conservatives wary of extra requirements on local police, and on civil libertarians who chafe at the idea of the government controlling more information about people, even convicted animal abusers.
I dont think its a good use of a law enforcement officials time, said Michael R. Long, chairman of the state Conservative Party.
He also said that civil liberties infringements could be an issue.
In 2011, the bill passed through the Senate Agriculture Committee, chaired by state Sen. Patricia A. Ritchie, R-Heuvelton. Mrs. Ritchie voted to approve the bill.
Mrs. Ritchie said that law enforcement officials havent complained about extra requirements that could come of the bill. Instead, theyve said that its too difficult to know how to enforce the law.
The legislation would help people who are trying to sell or give away pets.
They want to make sure that theyre sending them to the appropriate homes, and the people theyre sending these pets to are going to be good owners, and not people who are going to do something potentially like what happened in Utica, Mrs. Ritchie said.
The cost to the state is to be determined, according to the legislation.
Erie County, in Western New York, has considered a similar animal abuse registry proposal. Suffolk County enacted one two years ago.
State Sen. Michael H. Ranzenhofer, R-Amherst, voted yes without recommendation on the bill when it came up in 2011. It signaled that he had some concerns namely, that the technology used in the bill was antiquated. For example, the sex offender registry uses a website and other forms of electronic notification, but this would leave each county to create its own registry and would require police to notify homes and businesses.
Why are we doing something which seems a little bit less effective than the system that is in place (for sex offenders) right now? Mr. Ranzenhofer said, while adding that he supports the idea in concept.
Other bills that have been discussed or passed would increase penalties on animal abuse; one bill would make it a felony to steal a licensed dog or cat, and takes into account the monetary and emotional value of a pet.
The Legislature also may change the animal abuse laws so that theyre under the penal code, instead of the Department of Agriculture and Markets law, which police might not know how to find.
Its not just the well-being of animals thats at stake, Mr. Griffo said.
Im concerned that theres linkage between the abuse of animals and the abuse of people, he said.