Northern New York Newspapers
NNY Business
NNY Living
Sun., Oct. 4
Serving the community of Ogdensburg, New York

North country politicians differ on school aid formula changes


CANTON - When it comes to the complicated formula that’s used to dole out state money to public schools, the devil is in the details, according to Thomas R. Burns, superintendent of St. Lawrence-Lewis Board of Cooperative Educational Services.

That’s why he’s taking a cautious approach to forming an opinion on separate legislation proposals crafted by state Assemblywoman Addie J. Russell, D-Theresa, and Sen. Patricia A. Ritchie, R-Heuvelton.

Both lawmakers are fighting to have more funding diverted to low-wealth school districts like those in Northern New York, but they disagree on the best way to change the state aid formula to make that happen. With several area schools predicting bankruptcy unless something changes, lobbying for more school funding has moved into high gear.

Mr. Burns said education officials are in the process of analyzing how the different proposals would impact the state’s public schools, on a district-by-district basis.

“We need to make sure we get it right,” Mr. Burns said. “You really have to do sample state aid runs to see how they impact our districts. It merits some more examination on our part. We want to let our experts examine the proposals.”

Among those studying possible formula changes is Richard “Rick” G. Timbs, executive director of Statewide School Finance Consortium.

Other organizations that are closely following the situation and analyzing the aid formula proposals include the state’s Council of School Superintendents and the statewide School Finance the Rural Schools Association, he said.

Mrs. Russell said she plans to re-introduce a bill she proposed last year to overhaul the state’s school aid formula. Her legislation failed to gain a co-sponsor last year in the state Senate, with both Mrs. Ritchie and state Sen. Joseph A. Griffo, R-Rome, declining to co-sponsor.

Besides funneling more money to poor, rural schools, Mrs. Russell said her plan will also bring more dollars to poor city school districts across the state, which may increase the chance of getting her bill passed. Her proposal also eliminates a provision that requires all school districts, even wealthy ones, to receive a minimum of $500 in state aid per student.

Ending the minimum aid allocation increases the amount of aid available for those districts who need it the most, she said.

Mr. Burns said he can’t support any formula change that sends more state aid to wealthy school districts, so he will be analyzing the proposed formula changes to determine how they impact the statewide system.

“We have to send every dime to the neediest districts. We are at that point,” Mr. Burns said. “We can’t accept any formula that sends additional aid to districts that are three to 10 times wealthier than our communities.”

Calling the funding situation faced by many public schools, “deplorable,” Mrs. Russell said rural districts need to team up with poor urban areas, including the state’s “big five” city school districts, in supporting the provisions in her legislation.

“It’s essential that all poor school district communities band together and work to reform the school aid formula in this year’s budget process and they can use this bill as the model language,” Mrs. Russell said in an emailed statement. “The inequity in the state’s school aid funding is pushing our school districts over their own fiscal cliff.”

But her legislation has been faulted by Mrs. Ritchie and others who believe the Assembly bill would steer an even larger share of state aid to New York City.

Mrs. Ritchie has a different bill that’s also designed to bring more funding to poor rural schools by changing the formula used in the state education law.

She said she’s concerned the formula changes proposed by Mrs. Russell will be rejected by the governor because they’d require a massive increase in state funding, and the money isn’t there.

“There is not a huge pot of money to go around,” she said. “My focus was to try to help rural schools. I took a narrower focus.”

However, Mrs. Ritchie said Monday she is willing to try to reach a compromise with Mrs. Russell because they share the goal of helping struggling north country public school districts.

“I’m certainly open to having conversations with her,” she said.

Both Mrs. Ritchie and Mrs. Russell support changing the existing wealth ratio formula so that it more accurately reflects a community’s wealth. The existing law only allows districts to use a minimum of .65 when calculating aid even though many districts have lower ratios. Mrs. Russell’s bill would drop the lower ceiling to .25 and increase the upper ceiling from 2 to 3.

These provisions, she said, allow for calculating school aid based on actual figures instead of rounding the poor district wealth ratios up and the wealthy districts down.

By contrast, Ms. Ritchie’s bill reduces the floor of the wealth ratio formula from .65 to .40, but does not adjust the upper ceiling.

Both bills would allow districts to calculate aid based on data from the past five years which would assist schools with declining student enrollment, such as several north country districts have experienced.

Mrs. Russell said Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s 2013 state budget needs to include funding changes for public school because many are on the brink of bankruptcy.

“The governor is in the process of preparing his budget. The time is right for advocacy,” she said.

Commenting rules:
  1. Stick to the topic of the article/letter/editorial.
  2. When responding to issues raised by other commenters, do not engage in personal attacks or name-calling.
  3. Comments that include profanity/obscenities or are libelous in nature will be removed without warning.
Violators' commenting privileges may be revoked indefinitely. By commenting you agree to our full Terms of Use.
Syracuse Football Tickets Giveaway
Connect with Us
OGD on FacebookOGD on Twitter